|
Video
& Audio Cassettes Vcd's
and Dvd's

|
| |
WHO WERE RESPONSIBLE IN KILLING OF
KARBALÂ?
On the 10th of Muharram Al-Haram,
61 A.H., a most abominable and tragic event occurred in the desert of Karbalâ that resulted in the martyrdom (shahadah) of Hussain Ibn Ali
, the grandson
of our Prophet and the son of his daughter, along with most of the members
of his family and their supporters. It should be borne in mind that this tragedy
did not take place all of a sudden like a bolt from the blue. It was in fact the
manifestation of the plot of Sabayees which had claimed the life of Uthman ,
the third Caliph and the son-in-law of the Prophet
Twenty- five years
earlier. Caliph Uthman’s
martyrdom took place on 18th of Dhu Al-Hajj, 36
A.H.
We must not overlook the fact
that the struggle between the forces of good and evil is a continuous process
which never ends. In the history of mankind, evil has reigned supreme most of
the time whereas the triumph of good has been sporadic and short-lived. Another
well-established fact is that the evil forces, even if subdued and subjugated,
never acknowledge total defeat. On the contrary, they become submissive for a
while and lay low, waiting for an opportunity to strike back. Often the evil
forces, when subdued, go underground but never abandon their struggle to cause
rift and strife among their opponents. The Prophet of Islam
brought about
an incomparable and unprecedented revolution in the history of mankind, a unique
miracle for all times, and established a state and government to dispense
justice to the people over a vast tract of the globe. In the words of the Qur'ân:
…the Truth came and the
falsehood vanished... (Al-Isra 17:81)
But toward the end of the
Prophet ’s revolution, the evil forces put on a disguise and lay low, waiting
for the right moment for a counter-attack. Thus, immediately after the demise of
the Prophet , insurgencies raised their ugly heads against the
Islaamic
state. False prophets and defiants of Zakat challenged the central authority and
waged wars against the state of Al-Madinah Al-Munawwara. These were the
counter-revolutionary forces, determined to disintegrate the newly established
Islaamic state; but through resolute and prompt action, Abu Bakr Siddique ,
the first Caliph, defeated them and consolidated the achievements of the Prophet
’s Islamic Revolution. It was a great service to
Islaam rendered by the
first Caliph who had a short but glorious reign.
In the next twenty years which
include the reigns of Omar and Uthman
, the second and third Caliph
of Islaam, many more countries were conquered under the banner of Islaam and the
Muslim empire extended over a vast expanse of the globe, comprising Iraq, Syria,
Iran on one side and a large part of North Africa including Egypt and Morocco on
the other. But the historical process has its immutable laws. As the Revolution
of the Prophet was challenged by the reactionary movements on the Arab
land, the same happened with the conquests of those two Caliphs. The first
target of these reactionaries was the person of Omar
who was assassinated
by Abu Luloo Feroze, a Parsi slave from Iran. It was purely an Iranian plot
hatched by Hurmuzan, an Iranian general, who thought that if Omar
was
removed from the scene, the empire of Islaam would fall like a house of cards.
But by the grace of Allah (SWT), it survived the calamity. Abdullah Ibn Saba, a
Jew from Yemen, under the garb of a Muslim, took his sojourn at Madeenah. He had
all the trappings of an expert plotter and the Jewish genius at intrigues, an
attribute of his clan. He planted subversive ideas among the people. He pleaded
for the usurped rights of the house of the Prophet Muhammad , carried out a
propaganda campaign against Caliph Uthman
and incited the people to
revolt. He declared Ali
to be the rightful successor to the Prophet
Muhammad and dubbed Uthman
as a usurper. He told people that every
Prophet has a wasee and Ali
is the wasee of Prophet Mohammad
and,
therefore, entitled to be the caliph after the Prophet. He also preached the
divinity of Ali , thus striking at
Tauheed, the very root of Islaam. The
Iranians, who had embraced Islaam only a few years before, were taken in by this
propaganda because they had a long history of kingship and hero-worship. They
were familiar with the divine rights of kings, and hero-worship was diffused in
their blood. They readily accepted these ideas and became their champions.
Similarly Abdullah Ibn Saba floated another viewpoint related to the second
appearance of Prophet Isa (AS). He argued that Prophet Muhammad , who is
the best amongst the prophets of Allaah (SWT), would also appear with Christ, for
the contrary would imply that he is inferior to Prophet Isa (AS). This was the
same argument used by the Qadianis in later years, who invented the notion of
the death and burial of Prophet Isa (AS) in Kashmir. They argued that it was
illogical for Prophet Muhammad
to have died and for Prophet Isa (AS) to be
alive in the heaven. Unsophisticated and illiterate Muslims saw a point of
adoration in it for Prophet Muhammad
and fell an easy prey to that sort of
propaganda.
Abdullah Ibn Saba travelled all
over the Muslim lands and set up his propaganda centers at Basra and Kufa, but
his attempts failed in Damascus. Then he went to Egypt where he formed a party
of his supporters. Consequently, the last two years of Caliph Uthman’s
reign were filled with machinations, intrigue, and turmoil all over Muslim
territories. It culminated in the most unjustified murder (martyrdom) of Caliph
Uthman
who was the ruler of a vast empire and had tens of thousands of
soldiers under his command but refused to shed the blood of Muslims in
self-protection. Governors of provinces from all over the empire besought the
Caliph to allow them to send troops to quell the uprising and to protect his
person from the rebels who had surrounded his residence, but he remained strict
and steadfast in his decision. It is perhaps a unique and unprecedented episode
in the entire history of mankind that a very powerful man, like the Caliph
Uthman , refused to use authority for his personal safety and let himself
be assassinated. May Allah (SWT) shower His blessings on him.
The murder of Habeel (son of
Adam) by his brother Qabeel is perhaps an incident comparable to Caliph
Uthman’s
assassination. When Qabeel declared his intention to kill
Habeel, the latter announced his resolve, in the words of the Qur'ân:
Even if thou stretch out
thy hand against me, I shall not stretch out my hand against thee to kill
thee; lo! I fear Allah the Lord of the worlds. (Al-Ma’ida 5:28)
So, Habeel was assassinated by
his brother and that was the first act of homicide in the history of mankind. It
was a totally unjustified murder in which the victim refused to offer resistance
as in the assassination of Caliph Uthman (RAA). For such an act, Allah (SWT) has
declared His reward and punishment in the Qur'ân:
For that cause We decreed
for the children of Israel that whosoever killeth a human being for other
than manslaughter of corruption in the earth, it shall be as if he had
killed all mankind, and saveth the life of one person, it shall be as if he
had saved the life of all mankind...
(Al-Ma’ida 5:32).
Before Caliph Uthman ’s
assassination, Abdullah Ibn Salam , a Jewish scholar who had converted to
Islaam, addressed the rebels surrounding the residence of the Caliph in these
words: "O people! beware of murdering a caliph of a Rasool (Messenger of
Allah) for, I am a scholar of Torah and I tell you that Allaah avenges the murder
of His prophets and the murder of the deputies of his prophets (caliphs). There
has hardly been any murder of a prophet which Allaah has not avenged by
inflicting death on seventy thousand people and the murder of a caliph by
inflicting death on thirty five thousand people." Now it is on record that,
after the martyrdom of Hadrat Uthman , the conflict and strife among the
Muslim continued for almost five years. Civil war broke out and three major
battles — Jamal, Siffeen and Nahrwan — were fought, causing eighty-four
thousand deaths of Muslims at the hands of other Muslims. Many a pious and good
Muslims were slain by the sword of fellow Muslims. Amongst them were eminent
Companions like Talha , Zubair
, Ammar Ibn Yasir
and many more.
Ali , the fourth Caliph, also sacrificed his life in this strife. Ameer
Mu‘awiya
was also attacked but survived. Amar Ibn Al-Aas
survived
a murder attempt due to an alibi; his proxy was killed instead. The schism and
strife among the Muslims caused by Abdullah Ibn Saba and his followers claimed
countless valuable lives.
An instance from the
authenticated record of the battle of Jamal is narrated here to illustrate how
Muslims fell victims to the traps laid by the Sabayees. After the occupation of
Basra, Umm Al-Momineen [Mother of the Believers] Aa'ishah
received a message from Caliph Ali
for
talks and negotiation. It should be remembered that she was never a claimant for
the caliphate. Her only demand was that the murderers of Uthman
must be
punished immediately. Ali
offered to accept her demand if his hands were
first strengthened by a declaration of allegiance to him by her group. Both the
armies of Aa'ishah
and Ali
were facing each other and camping on the
battle field when these negotiations started. The news of this negotiation
reached Abdullah Ibn Saba and Malik Ibn Ashter Nakhey. They immediately pursued
their nefarious plot to undermine the peace talks. Accordingly, under the cover
of darkness, they, along with some of their followers, mounted an attack on Umm
Al-Momineen Aa'ishah’s
camp and the rumor was spread that the attack was
made by the forces loyal to Ali . At the same time, they sent the word to
Ali ’s
camp that Umm Al-Momineen Aa'ishah’s
forces had initiated
the attack. Consequently the opposing armies clashed with each other with all
their might, leaving thousands dead on the battle field. It is a very painful
part of Muslim history that no investigation to discover the truth in time was
ever successful. The same thing happened at the battle of Siffeen. When a stage
for peaceful negotiations was set, the Sabayees undermined it and a new scion of
dissidents, the Khawarij, appeared on the scene, opening another front for the
warring factions.
During the reign of Caliph Ali , the Muslim empire did not exit as a single state under one central
authority but broke up into various power centers. Ameer Mu'awiyah , the
governor of Syria, demanded avenge of Uthman’s
murder. "The
assassins of Uthman
are in your camp and they are your advisers. I will
not declare allegiance to you unless they are punished," he insisted. It
should be borne in mind that Ameer Mu'awiyah
did not put forward his
claim to the Caliphate and was contented with the governorship of Syria. Whether
his demand and pressure on Ali
was justified or not is an open issue, and
everyone is entitled to have an opinion.
Caliph Ali
was killed by
a Khariji, and his son Hassan
accepted the allegiance of the people at
Kufa, a big army base. It appeared that another conflict was in the making.
Hassan Ibn Ali , leading a forty thousand strong contingent, marched to
Medina where he had to confront Ameer Mu‘awiya , the governor of Syria,
who faced him with a huge army. A small squad was leading the army of Hassan
It was rumored that the squad had a clash with the enemy and suffered a defeat.
The persons responsible for spreading this rumor were never identified. Upon
hearing the rumor, the Kufi forces revolted against Hassan
and not only
looted his camp but also manhandled him. He had to take refuge in Chosroes’
palace. But this incident shook the confidence of Hassan Ibn Ali
in his
Kufi supporters; he therefore sent a word to Ameer Mu'awiyah
for peace
talks. Ameer Mu'awiyah
not only accepted the offer but also sent a blank
cheque, so to say, for a settlement in accordance with the terms of Hassan ,
who laid down the following conditions:
The tax collections from the
province of Ahwaz shall be paid to Hassan .
A grant of two million dirham
shall be paid annually to Hussain , his younger brother.
Banu Hashim shall be
preferred in the distribution of allowances and grants.
A general amnesty shall be
declared for all who took part in the battle.
Ameer Mu'awiyah
accepted
all these terms and peace was restored in the sprawling empire. Strife and civil
war came to an end and the state was unified under one central authority as he
forced allegiance from all the dissidents. Hassan Ibn Ali , commenting on
the transfer of authority, said, "If Mu'awiyah was the rightful successor
to the Caliphate, he has received it and if I had that right, I, too, have
passed it on to him; so the matter ends there." This was in accordance with
the prophecy of the Holy Prophet
about Hassan
when he had said,
"Through my son Hassan, Allah will bring about peace between tow warring
factions of Muslims." It was an honor bestowed on Hassan Ibn Ali
by
Allah (SWT), but the Sabayees were highly indignant at his peace move. They
called him names and taunted him with the words "Ya Aar Al-Momeneen"
(O, Shame for the believers!) and "Ya Mozill Al-Momineen" (You, the
debaser of the Believers!). Ostensibly they were his supporters, but in fact
expressed their utter resentment at his action for peace making which ushered in
an era of twenty years of unity and tranquility in the Muslim empire.
Muslims belonging to Ahl
Al-Sunnah Wal-Jama‘ah (the Sunni sect of Islam) do not include Ameer
Mu’awiya’s
reign in Al-Khilafah Al-Rashidah (the period of Rightly
Guided Caliphate). But Ameer Mu‘awiya ’s
twenty years reign is still
considered to be the best period in the entire Muslim history after Al-Khilafah
Al-Rashidah, because during his reign all the functions of a Muslim state —
maintenance of peace, dispensation of justice, struggle for the supremacy of
Islaam, dissemination of the Word of Allaah (SWT) — were performed admirably
well. The reign of Omar Ibn Abdul Aziz (RA) is also considered a glorious era of
Islaamic history, but it should be borne in mind that Ameer Mu‘awiyah —
who was not only a Companion of the Holy Prophet
but also a scribe of
Divine Revelation — stands much higher in rank and status than Omar Ibn Abdul
Aziz
because the latter was a Taba‘yee (a companion of the Companions of
the Prophet) and not a Sahabi. It is the common belief of the Sunnis that
however pious a person may be, he cannot be rated equal to the lowest among the
Companions of the Prophet .
Hassan Ibn Ali
lived for
ten years during the reign of Ameer Mu‘awiya , and after the peace
agreement between the two, they had a very close and friendly relationship.
However, Hassan
was poisoned to death, most probably by the same group who
were enraged at his armistice with Ameer Mu‘awiya . By no stretch of
imagination this heinous deed can be ascribed to Ameer Mu’awiya
who had
no grudge against Hassan .
Before we discuss the
nomination of Yazeed as a successor to his father, it would be appropriate to
understand some basic and relevant issues. Firstly, the differences in belief (aqeeda)
and juristic interpretation (fiqh) among the various sects of the Muslim Ummah
have been grossly exaggerated. The Sunnis have no disagreement regarding belief,
and have only some minor differences over the interpretation of the Shari‘ah.
In fact, there are only two sects in Islam, i.e. Sunni and Shi‘ah, because
they differ over beliefs as well as over the interpretation of Shari‘ah. There
are certain differences which do not cause the parting of ways. For instance,
opinions about historical events and personalities can be overlooked. If one
considers Ali
better than Abu Bakr , one can do so because it does
not contravene any basic tenet of Islaam. Similarly, the Sunnis believes Abu Bakr
the best among the entire mankind after the prophets of Allah (SWT), yet
this does not constitute any basic article of faith of a Muslim. However, the
concept of the Infallible Imamate maintained by the Shi‘ahs is unacceptable
because it strikes at the very root of the concept of Prophethood. Only the
prophets were continuously guarded against and protected by Allaah (SWT) from any
sin, and with the termination of Prophethood the privilege of infallibility has
been taken away by Allaah (SWT) from all the progeny of Adam. The door of
personal judgment (Ijtihad) is open while the door of Divine Revelation (Nabuwwah)
has been closed forever.
Ijtihad, the exercise of
personal judgment within the framework of the guidance provided by the Qur'ân and the Sunnah (the sayings and doings of the Prophet) is a privilege vouchsafed
to every Muslim who is well-versed in the teachings of Islaam. The possibility of
an error of judgment can never be ruled out because to err is human. But any
judgement or decision made in good faith and with a clear conscience has a
reward for the judge, regardless of the correctness of the judgment. That is the
belief of the Muslim Ummah. In the light of this principle, we can judge the
actions of all the caliphs of Islaam to be without malice and can hold any
opinion we like provided it is not derogatory to their status as the Companions
of the Prophet Muhammad .
Now let us look at the issue of
Yazeed’s nomination by his father, Ameer Mu'awiyah , as an heir-apparent
to the caliphate. According to authentic historical records, it was done on the
advice of Moghira Ibn Sho‘ba , who was a very intelligent and far-sighted
Companion of the Holy Prophet . He argued that on the death of Ameer
Mu’awiya ,the issue of his succession, if remained uncertain, might
plunge the Ummah once again into a war as had happened in the pre-Mu'awiyah
period; hence it was advisable to nominate a person to wield authority in the
event of Ameer Mu‘awiyah ’s death. He also suggested the name of Ameer
Mu’awiya ’s son Yazeed for the job. Now it is open to question whether this
decision was justified or not, but no aspersions should be cast on Ameer
Mu’awiya
or Moghira
who arrived at the conclusion with a clear
conscience and in good faith. Both occupy venerable positions in the order of
merit of the Companions of the Prophet
. Moghira
was one of those who swore
allegiance to the Prophet
under the tree (on the occasion of Baiy‘ah Al-Ridwan)
and Allah (SWT) has commended all of them who took part in that (Al-Qur'ân: Al-Fath 48:18). He remained a faithful friend and supporter of Ali
throughout his life. But much water had flown under the bridge since
Ali ’s
times and he could apprehend danger in the absence of most of the influential
Companions of the Holy Prophet
who had died by then (60 A.H.). The new
generation did not have that sense of responsibility or moral embellishment as
the old had. In view of such arguments, they took a decision counter to the
democratic spirit inculcated by the Prophet
among his followers.
Nevertheless, they cannot be condemned as having ulterior motives of their own,
apart from the good of the Ummah, because the Sunnis believe in the diction
which asserts:
All Companions of the
Prophet
Muhammad
were just.
We can differ with the
Companions, but we cannot malign them as malafide.
Now look at the other side of
the picture. Many prominent dignitaries among the Muslims including the three Abad Allah — i.e., Abdullah Ibn Zubair
, Abdullah Ibn Omar
,
Abdullah Ibn Abbas
as also Hussain Ibn Ali
and Abdur Rehman Ibn Abu
Bakr
— not only disapproved of Yazeed’s nomination but also declared
it against the spirit of Islaam. The historic comment of Abdur Rehman Ibn Abu
Bakr , when he was asked for allegiance to Yazeed’s heirship, is well
worth taking note of. He said, "Now instead of acting upon the Prophet ’s
and the rightly guided Caliphs’ tradition, do you want to adopt the
tradition of Caesar and Chosroes?" Also, the fact cannot be overlooked
that, except these five prominent Muslims, many others, including a large number
of the Companions of the Prophet , swore allegiance to Yazeed’s
nomination. All these people cannot be maligned and declared mala fide. Some may
even allege that Ameer Mu'awiyah bought their loyalties. If we accept
this premise, by the same token it can also be alleged that Hassan Ibn Ali too was bought over, and the Shi‘ahs consider Hassan
to be an Imaam
Masoom (an infallible guide or leader). Obviously this is not the right course
of thought and argument because, if pursued to the logical conclusion, it would
tarnish many illustrious names among the Muslims. The only right conduct for us
could be to absolve all those who supported Yazeed as well as those who opposed
him of all blame because they all acted according to their convictions and for
the good of the Muslim Ummah.
Now let us examine the stand
which Hussain Ibn Ali
took in the situation. As said earlier, he sincerely
believed that the nomination of Yazeed to the heirship of the Caliphate would
destroy the spirit of democracy and republicanism nurtured and developed so
assiduously during the Prophet ’s era and afterward, and that it would lead to
hereditary kingship which was repugnant to the original political teaching of
Islaam. He therefore resolved to oppose this with all the resources at his
command. The bag load of communications, sent to him by the people of Kufa, not
only approved of his stand but also promised support and loyalty to his cause.
Kufa was a military base and a very strategic city situated at the crossroads to
Iran and Syria. He thought that if the people of Kufa supported him, as their
letters written to him indicated, it would be possible to effectively neutralize
the change being brought about in the body politic of the Muslim Ummah. So he
argued and resolved to act for that cause. Abdullah Ibn Abbas
also shared
his thoughts but he opposed Hussain 's
going to Kufa because he knew the
Kufis better and warned him not to repose his confidence in their loyalty. The
Kufis had earlier betrayed Ali and his son Hassan
. Abdullah Ibn Omar
and Abdullah Ibn Zubair
also had similar opinions about the Kufi
character and vehemently besought Hussain
not to depend on their words
would be against him; "Under the slightest pressure or pecuniary coercion
the Kufis would change their loyalties," the three Abad Allah warned
Hussain . But he appeared to have taken a firm decision. So he brushed
aside all their pleadings and warnings, and decided to proceed to Kufa, placing
his confidence in Allah (SWT). For he acted in the true spirit of Allah’s and
the Prophet’s command:
So when you have decided
(on a course of action) repose your confidence in Allah (Aal-e-Imran 3:159).
It may be argued that Hussain
committed a mistake in the assessment of the situation, but no insinuations
about his intentions can be entertained. He had no lust for power or avarice for
wealth. This is the common belief of the Ahl Al-Sunnah Wal-Jama‘ah (the
Sunnis). They do not consider him, like all non-Prophets, to be infallible; at
the same time they do not doubt his integrity either.
When the nomination issue was
deliberated upon in Madinah, Abdullah Ibn Zubair
went over to Makkah and
so did Hussain , because some prominent Muslim were of the opinion that
Makkah would be the best place as a stronghold or base for launching a campaign
for building up public opinion against Yazeed’s heirship. However, before any
significant work could be done in this regard, Ameer Mu'awiyah
died and
Ameer Yazeed took over the reigns of government. Now Hussain
received
heaps of letters from the Kufis pledging their loyalty and support to him if he
mounted an attack against Ameer Yazeed’s forces. He sent his cousin Muslim Ibn
Aqeel
to Kufa to find out facts. Soon he received an affirmation of the
loyalty of Kufis from his cousin and he started preparations for a journey to
Kufa. Abdullah Ibn Omar
and Abdullah Ibn Abbas
pleaded vigorously
against his plan and entreated him to at least leave women and children in
Makkah if he was determined to proceed to Kufa. But Hussain ignored their
suggestions. On the way he received the report of Muslim Ibn Aqeel’s
death at the hands of Ameer Yazeed’s men and the apathy and indifference
displayed by the people of Kufa at this incident, and also the news that the
Kufis had shifted their loyalties to Ameer Yazeed, pledging support to him
against Hussain
and his followers.
Now Hussain
was in a dilemma should he continue his journey towards Kufa or return to Makkah? The
Arab tradition of avenging the murder of their man, at all costs, was too strong
for him to resist. Besides, the close relatives of Muslim Ibn Aqeel , who
were accompanying Hussain , declared their resolve to punish the assassins
and continue their march. For Hussain , it was below his dignity to abandon
them and return to Makkah. So, he decided to continue his march to Kufa.
Meanwhile Auon and Mohammad, the two young sons of Abdullah Ibn Jaffer Tayyar, a
cousin of Hussain , arrived with their father’s message:
"For
God’s sake, don’t go to Kufa." However, Hussain
continued his
journey with these two boys joining his camp and arrived at the desert of
Karbala. Ibn Ziad, the governor of Kufa, arrived there with one thousand
soldiers under his command and offered one option to Hussain
in accordance
with the instruction from Ameer Yazeed: "You can neither go to Kufa nor
return to Makkah, but you can go any where else you want." Obviously, the
only course open for Hussain
was to Damascus, the capital. It is very
unfortunate that he turned down the offer and continued his sojourn at Karbala
trying to win over the support of Ibn Ziad’s men because in his addresses to
the Kufis under Ibn Ziad’s command, he mentioned the persons by name who had
written letters to him pledging loyalty and support and pleaded with them to
honor their pledges. The Kufis, fearing the possibility of ensuing persecution
and punishment, disowned their letters and denied their authorship.
Meanwhile, a reinforcement of
four thousand soldiers, under the command of Amar Ibn Sa‘d, arrived at Kufa
from Damascus. Amar was the son of Sa‘d Ibn Abi Waqas , the conqueror of
Iran, and was also related to Hussain
for whom he had all the sympathies.
Talks of reconciliation continued but the Kufis, fearing reprisals in case of a
reconciliation, forced their leader Ibn Zaid to toughen his attitude. Realizing
this, Hussain
placed three options before them: "Allow me to return
to Makkah safely, or allow me to proceed to the frontiers of the Muslim empire
so that I may continue my campaign against non-Muslims, or allow me a safe
passage to the capital, Damascus, where I may settle the issue with Ameer Yazeed
in person."
The conspirators, however,
succeeded in undermining the reconciliation talks and forced Amar Ibn Sa‘d to
corner Hussain .
"Either surrender unconditionally or get ready for
war," they demanded. Obviously an unconditional surrender by Hussain
was a tall order and a challenge to his honor and dignity. He was constrained to
fight the enemy though heavily outnumbered and under-quipped. Thus, the Sabayee
conspiracy that sabotaged the peace talks just before the battles of Jamal and
Siffeen was successful once again, and Hussain
and all his camp followers
were slain mercilessly on the sands of Karbala. However, all of them displayed
unflinching courage and valor on the battle-field.
In apportioning blame for this
tragedy, fictitious stories have been fabricated about the disagreements between
Ali
and Uthman . In fact, there were no disagreements between the
two, who respected and loved each other like brothers. It is again the Sabayee
elements who concocted bogus stories and phony events to cover up their own
heinous acts of perfidy in this drama of strife and partisan-politics forced on
the Muslims. No attempt has ever been made to unmask their ugly faces and
instead their version of these episodes has been accepted as authentic,
resulting in deep malignity against the highly venerable and illustrious
personalities of the Companions of the Prophet Muhammad .
From the assassination of
Uthman
right up to the tragic event at Karbala, one can easily discern the
hidden hand of Sabayee agents who successfully plotted against the solidarity of
the Muslim Empire and plunged it into senseless bloodshed. The entire blame must
be placed on them, where it rightfully belongs, and the fair names of the
Companions of the Prophet , who are all adool (scrupulously just), must be
exonerated from the calumny and ignominy to which they have been exposed through
the malicious propaganda of the Sabayees.
It would be worthwhile to
mention here two instances of fair play and God-fearing conduct of Ali
and
Ameer Yazeed. When Ali
defeated Umm Al-Momineen A'aishah at the battle
of Jamal, he treated her with the same reverence and decorum to which she was
entitled as one of the "Mothers of the Believers." He conducted her
and her retinue of ladies and gentlemen with all the respect and security to Madeenah. This amply demonstrates that there was no personal enmity or malice
between the two. Again, when the battle survivors, ladies, and children from
Hussain ’s
camp of Karbala arrived at Damascus, Ameer Yazeed treated them
with due regard and respect and expressed his sympathies with them. He also
expressed his sincere condolences at the needless bloodshed and said, "Had
Ibn Ziad not gone to such an extent, I would have been pleased with him even
then."
The two martyrdoms, that of
Uthman
and of Hussain , have caused agony in the hearts of the Muslim
Ummah and have cast their gloomy shadows over its fourteen hundred year history.
The have caused dissension and fighting among the Muslims who have fallen into
the trap of those who sowed the seeds of discord and shifted the blame to the
most respected persons of the Ummah. It is, in fact, the triumph of those
intriguing elements who were jubilant over their accomplishment. Now, we are at
each other’s throat and hurl bad names and odium on the very honorable
personalities of Islaam. Some people consider names of Yazeed and Shimer a
symbols of profanity and an anathema while some others use Amar Ibn Sa‘d’s
and Ameer Mu‘awiya’s
names as expletives. May Allah guide such people
to the right course and protect us from sharing their company or views and give
us the wisdom and strength to heed Prophet’s warning:
Beware of expressing
opinions about my Companions and, after I am gone, do not use them for your
own ends; for whosoever will love them would do so because of their love for
me and whosoever would have rancor against them, would do so because of
their rancor against me.
| |
|