|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REPLY TO A HERETIC Professor Abdul Hadi Plazzi By SHAIKH ABU ABDUR-RAHMAN YAHYA SILMY BIN M. NUBAR AS-SAYLANI AS-SALAFI AS-ATHARI (hafizahullaah) Professor
Abdul Hadi Plazzi wrote as : Dear Brother Palazzi, Reading your answer I find that I should answer to you the very same way you are coming with me. Since I wrote to you have ignored me in all the questions which I have raised to you. If you think that you are eager to accept the truth look well openly your eyes into what I say do not try to always ignore and be proud of what you have. What you have written to me is nothing new to surprise me, but I was expecting you answers of my points which could keep the discussion more clear. Not only you have ignored the questions but as well have trembled over words and phrases as your habit without any evidences once again. How ever I am here once again to help you understand the matter. YOUR STATEMENT MY COMMENTS : YOUR STATEMENT : MY COMMENTS : If you have something new let me know it so that I can answer to you direct on
that issue. Here I am presenting to you those Imams whom I found similar to what
Imam Muhammed bin Abdul Wahab has spoken in his Kitaab At-Tawheed. Now look at
them care fully and tell me is still Muhammed bin Abdul Wahhab a
"heretic". I have placed the Hijri death dates in the brackets to know
how earlier and near to the time of Prophet Muhammed Among the Sahabas:
Are you as well going to call all these Imams "heretic".. If you want I can place the statements and the Aqeedah of each Imam whom I have mentioned in the above given list. To make it more easy to you to know the Aqeedah of these above mentioned Imams
the following the references. Some of the Hijri dates of death are mentioned
while others ignored if you need them I may take to even note them for you to
know did they all also read the book of Imam Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab to talk
of all these what very same things which are being talked by Imam Muhammad bin
Abdul Wahhab in his book of Tawheed.
If you open your eyes and read the above mentioned books you may come to know
what you have read all these years and what the change the world of Islam have
in it's Aqeedah, Fiqh and Manhaj and other subjects from before the 300 Hijri
and the later Hijri years. Yes still the Scholars after 300 Hijri have been
conveying this message but in every time the quantity of these scholars more
and more less as the Prophet Muhammed Those books which you have mentioned in your website are of not any value in the field of education or research study, neither any of it have any evidence from the understanding of Sahabas, Tabeens, or Taba Tabeens its all things claimed and blamed on the scholars of the religion most of that false no any true evidence behind it. At the same time ignorance of derivation of rules and regulations from the Qur'aan and Sunnah is clear to me as clear as the Sun light at the day time. This may take me sometime to make a complete refutation of it. If Allah wish and He the almighty bless me in my time I may take that project of refutation, But frankly speaking I do not feel any importance to refute them as those who consult the books of Imam Muhammed bin Abdul Wahhab clearly states the lies of these books, as well clearly shows the deviation of these books from the path which has been chosen by Imam Muhammed bin Abdul Wahhab, As Imam Muhammed bin Abdul Wahhab in his book always qoutes the above mentioned Imams and the qoutations from the Sahabas, Tabeens, Taba Tabeens so even if Imam Muhammed bin Abdul Wahhab was mistaken but not for all the Sahabas, Tabeens and the Taba Tabeens. While these books which mentioned by you and as well in your website have no any ground for surety of the truth , Nor do they have the understanding of the Sahabas , nor of the Tabeens, nor of the Taba Tabeens neither any qoutation of these Sahabas with any authentification gives then any value in their work, All what I understand from the books mentioned by you and the website mentioned by you is nothing except the following in short words :
Tell me now I am talking with consultation not that my Shiekh told me so … Brother Palazzi I feel your situation, well come ahead for the consultation of those books which I have mentioned to you and let us have the matter understood clearly if you are sincerely searching the truth. YOU STATED AS : MY COMMENTS :
All these four so called mazhabs being claimed to these Imam none of these are
the students of these four Imams, neither none of these have similar Aqeedah as that of the four Imams. Another main point to be understood : Each Imam refused many of the facts of the previous Imams matters when they saw fault in it. If refusing a fault was a reason for calling a man heretic all the scholars of Islam should be called heretic. It is the Hanafi fiqh writes in their main reference as following :"A Hanafi cannot marry a Shafi except as an Ahlul Kitaab" tell me Mr. Palazzi where did Muhammed bin Abdul Wahhab or Imam Ibn Tayymiyah or Shiekh Al-Albani or any other leading Sunni Scholars of this nation ever say that one cannot marry a person who have pronounced the Shahada. All the refutations we have to the Ahlul Bidah of the blind followers of different Mazhabs either in Fiqh or Aqeedah never a Fatwa nor a statement have ever been passed by these scholars that you cannot marry the follower of another mazhab or sect. Who is more heretic to the laws of Islam the one who keep up to the teaching of Qur'aan and Sunnah according to the understanding of the Sahabas or those who blindly take the Mazhabs as seperate religions in Islam itself. |
|
![Islaam pure and clear, that is according to the Qur'ân and the authentic Sunnah the way of the Salaf [ http://www.allaahuakbar.net ]](../../image/question.jpg)
they were. The death date of the Sahabas are not mentioned as every one knows
that they lived with the Prophet Muhammed